Services

Showing posts with label fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiction. Show all posts

Dystopian Fiction

“I wasn’t trying to predict the future. I was trying to prevent it” - Ray Bradbury


Two genres of speculative fiction that you probably read in school at some level are utopian fiction and dystopian fiction. Both explore social and political structures.

The word "utopia" was first used in direct context by Sir Thomas More in his 1516 work Utopia. The word resembles both the Greek words "no place", "outopos", and "good place", "eutopos". His book presents a vision of an ideal society. Plato's The Republic also presents an ideal society and its political system.

Dystopian fiction is "the opposite" - a world that is flawed to the extreme. Though it may resemble in some ways our present world or society, the projection of the future is negative.

Utopias and dystopias are often found in science fiction and other speculative fiction genres. Dystopian worlds often show mass poverty, public mistrust, police states, totalitarian rule, oppression and technology that is advanced and abused.

I used to teach “The Fun They Had,” an Isaac Asimov story from 1951. This was written at a time when computers were new and home computers were non-existent, even in predictions. Home schooling was not a common thing. Online learning wasn't even a term, as online had no meaning. Even television was in its early days. But all that is what the story combines. It is about children who are educated completely at home in front of a screen.

The story's conflict occurs when the computers break down one day. No lessons. During this down time, they are told about the way kids had once gone to schools. They were in rooms with lots of other kids their age. They had a human teacher. There was a playground. They left home every school day.

When I taught this story to middle school children, the irony wasn't always obvious to my students when the kids in the story think about those kids of the past (our present) and "the fun they had" back then.

Asimov's prediction/warning hasn't come completely true. We still have schools for the vast majority of kids, but they certainly spend a lot of time in front of screens in school and at home doing schoolwork.

Samuel Butler's Erewhon (an anagram of "nowhere') is an interesting example. Erewhon isn't a utopia but it is not a dystopia. It is satirical utopia, like Gulliver's Travels (1726). Both books satirize the British Empire of their time.
         

Two popular dystopias that you may have read in school are George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Orwell gives us Oceania, a country at perpetual war, with a population controlled through propaganda. Even people who haven't read the novel (or seen a movie version) have likely heard of the novel's Big Brother.

Aldous Huxley's novel world apparently started as a parody of utopian fiction. He created a "perfect" world of 2540 that he based on what he saw beginning in the industrial and social changes of 1931. In this utopia,the population is divided into five castes and accepts it because they are happily drugged and have been programmed since their birth in test tubes. No problems with old people - the World State kills everyone 60 years old or older.
         

Anthony Burgess's 1962 novel, A Clockwork Orange, became much more known when Stanley Kubrick made it into a film. It was (and probably still is) a film that shocks. I had a college professor who cancelled a class because she had just seen the film and was so upset by the treatment of women and violence that she said she could not each. The story is set in a future England where there is a extreme youth violence. The society's method of trying to rehabilitate those criminal youth is equally violent.



Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale describes a future United States governed by a totalitarian theocracy, where women have no rights. The TV series adaptation has made this tale more real, as Kubrick's film did earlier.

Young adult dystopian fiction has become a big business in print and on screens. The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, The House of the Scorpion by Nancy Farmer, Divergent, Insurgent by Veronica Roth, The Maze Runner by James Dashner, and Delirium by Lauren Oliver.

Like Asimov, when Ray Bradbury wrote his short story, “The Veldt,” televisions were just coming into homes. But he thought they were already changing a lot of things, including parenting. Television did become a babysitter, and sometimes it was a teacher.

But in “The Veldt,” Bradbury describes a family “nursery” that is what we would call  a very sophisticated Virtual Reality that is highly interactive. Not only does it babysit the kids, it raises them and becomes more and more seductive. Too seductive, according to the parents, who decide it needs to be shut down. The children don't like that one bit, and with the help of the African veldt they take revenge on their parents.

Bradbury was warning about what might happen if parental guidance was lost. I can easily imagine the stories he would be writing today about the state of TV and video games. What might he say about video games that are actually dystopias, such as the Fallout series, BioShock, and the later games of the Half-Life series.

Dystopian fiction is the worst visions of the future. That would appear in apocalyptic literature. "Apocalypse" is a Greek word that does not mean the end of the world. It means "revelation", an unveiling or unfolding of things not previously known. As you might suspect, the earliest apocalyptic writing comes from the literature of Judaism and Christianity. It encompasses writing that begins in the centuries following the Babylonian exile through the close of the Middle Ages. But those are tales for another day.

Out of a Marijuana Fog: Inherent Vice



Thomas Pynchon has a new book out this week. 

Did you know that books now have video trailers? You don't have to sit through book coming attractions before you read a book - yet - but here is the one for his new book, Inherent Vice.

    

Part noir, part psychedelic romp, all Thomas Pynchon— private eye Doc Sportello comes, occasionally, out of a marijuana haze to watch the end of an era as free love slips away and paranoia creeps in with the L.A. fog. Thomas Pynchon was always known for not being known (as in reclusive) but I was told that he is narrating the trailer. I couldn't tell you for sure, but it doesn't sound like a voice actor. Then again... Even the narrator is shocked at the price of the book. "$27.95? That used to be like... three weeks of groceries, man. What year's this again?"
I was assigned to read his novel Gravity's Rainbow and really struggled with it. But it was introduced by the professor as "a postmodern epic - the Ulysses of our half of the century." Set at the end of World War II, it concerns rockets by the German military and the mysterious device (Schwarzgerät) that will be installed in rocket #00000. 

No traditional plot or character development here. I kept reading. I felt I had to since I was an English major. My fellow students had very mixed reactions to the novel. We were not alone. According to Wikipedia,
In 1974, the three-member Pulitzer Prize jury on fiction supported Gravity's Rainbow for the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. However, the other eleven members of the board overturned this decision, branding the book "unreadable, turgid, overwritten and obscene." The novel was nominated for the 1973 Nebula Award for Best Novel and won the National Book Award in 1974. Since its publication, Gravity's Rainbow has spawned an enormous amount of literary criticism and commentary, including two readers' guides and several online concordances, and it is frequently cited as Pynchon's magnum opus. Time Magazine included the novel in its All-Time 100 Greatest Novels, a list of the best English-language novels from 1923 to 2005. In addition, it has appeared on several other "Greatest" lists, and is considered by some critics as one of the greatest American novels ever written.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers." -- Gravity's Rainbow





UPDATE

The book was made into a film

The Life Before Our Eyes


I read a review of the book The Life Before Her Eyes by Laura Kasischke back in 2002.

That was almost 3 years after the April 20, 1999
Littleton, Colorado school shooting. 12 innocent students and one teacher killed, 23 others wounded at Columbine High School.

It was just after the October 28, 2002 Tucson, Arizona incident where a 41 year old student at the nursing school at the University of Arizona, shot and killed three female professors and then himself.

I had spent 25 years teaching in middle and high school classrooms and had moved to a college in 2000. My wife was still teaching in a high school then, but she left a few years later and the shootings were part of the reason.

We didn't teach in tough inner-city schools. But the school shootings seemed to be happening in the suburban settings where that kind of thing wasn't supposed to happen.

When the tragic shootings occurred at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, I was working at NJIT, the tech university of New Jersey. My wife was at home. My oldest son was headed to Norris Hall on the Virginia Tech campus to meet with his senior project advisor, Professor Kevin Granata, to work with his team on their biomimetic walking robot.

My son had received an email at about 9:30 saying that there had been a shooting on campus, but that classes were on. He was waiting for a phone call from his girlfriend who had gone on a job interview. He decided to wait to go to class.

By the time he read that email, two students in a dormitory were already dead, and the shooter had moved to Norris Hall.

When the news picked up the story, he called his mother and they watched CNN together as he saw people he recognized running from the building.

What they couldn't see inside included Professor Kevin Granata bringing 20 students from a nearby classroom into his office on the third floor and telling them to keep the door locked. He went downstairs to investigate and was shot and killed. None of the students locked in his office were injured.

I came home from the college. It was terrible to watch, but we kept watching, until we could watch no more.

_____________

Last month, I saw the film version of the novel on my Netflix DVD list. I had added it to the list, but kept pushing it down to the bottom.

In the film, The Life Before Her Eyes, directed by Vadim Perelman, Uma Thurman plays an art professor who was witness to a school shooting in her high school when she was a student there. The film switches back and forth from the adult professor to her teenaged self (played by Evan Rachel Wood).

My wife and I did finally watch it, and I'm glad we did.

Since then I've read reviews of it and some are quite negative. They criticize some of the same things I appreciated in the film - the complex structure, beautiful cinematography, and psychological and imaginative direction. It's a movie you should see with people and talk about afterwards.

The film was released for the Toronto Film Festival in September 2007 and I suspect that the events of that past April made the release seem like the wrong thing to do. It was held back and then given a limited U.S. release in April 2008. That timing also seems wrong.

The strongest performance is by Evan Rachel Wood as the high school senior who witnesses a Columbine-like massacre. She is Diana, the wild side of a pairing with best friend Maureen (Eva Amurri), who is an evangelical Christian.

Diana wants out of her hometown to a place she doesn't even want to imagine yet. Maureen wants a husband, kids and the life that she has already planned for herself. Still, they are best friends.

The script for the film is by Emil Stern who adapted Laura Kasischke's novel and it's good at hinting at things that the novel can develop, but that can only be hinted at in the film by a few words, a shot, a look by the actor.

Diana fifteen years after the school shooting (Uma Thurman) can't seem to let go of what happened to her. Diana's eyes are lifeless, especially as contrasted by her younger self. She has a husband and daughter, but things are not right.

Some viewers are probably put off by the alternating adult/teen stories, but it worked for me. The director, Perelman (who also directed The House of Sand and Fog) uses montage to take us from memory to imagination and slow motion to hold on to moments before her eyes. The past, in the acting, photography and dialogue is more "real" than the present dreamwalking life Diana steps through.

I want to read the book in a few months. Not right now. But I did look up some information on Laura Kasischke who I knew as a poet before I knew she had written the novel.

I found this poem in her collection Gardening in the Dark. (The poem is available online.) I don't know that you'd see it as any companion to the novel or film, but it was the one that caught me after seeing the film and starting this little essay.

Sacred Flower Watching Me

Deep in the ground, in the center
of a bulb, in the scarlet
darkness wrapped in crackling

there is a pinprick
of light. It's hot. It stirs. It's spring—
pitiful and sweet as a small girl spanked.

My love, all of it, a life of it, has been
too little. Nor has my rage ever forced any diamonds
out of the blood through the skin.

How awful
resurrection
for someone like me will be. The teenage
girls are being dragged

out of the earth by their hair.

Tongues, testicles, plums, and small hearts bloat
sweetly in the trees. And then

a silence like water
poured into honey—

the silence of middle age.

But there are nights I feel a sacred
flower watching me.
Such affection!
Even in my cradle, it was waiting
warmly, its soft

white gaze

steady on my insufficient face.




The Curious Case of Fitzgerald's Benjamin Button

Life can only be understood backward.
It must be lived forward.~ Soren Kierkegaard

I read the short story "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" when I was an undergrad at Rutgers for a course on F. Scott Fitzgerald. I was going through a Fitzgerald phase then - the taunting proximity of his Princeton was probably a factor. The story is the closest thing to science-fiction that he ever wrote.

It's the story of Benjamin who is born in 1860 and looks like a seventy-year-old man and speaks to his father. Benjamin is aging backwards.

I liked the scene where at "18" he attempts to enroll at Yale University. Because he ran out of hair dye the day of his interview, the admissions folks turn him away because his gray hair makes him look 50. (Later, he ends up at Harvard. Take that Yale!)

You'll hear more about the story because you'll be hearing more about the movie version that will be released December 25th. It stars Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchette, so it will get attention.

There's a large type 64 page book version of the story and you can read it in several of The Short Stories of F. Scott Fitzgerald. (That collection has 43 stories, but there are at least 160 in the Fitzgerald canon.) However, you can read the story online at adelaide.edu.au and at virginia.edu.

This post is not a movie review, but I will say that it's the kind of movie I see as a hit or bomb. It's not something I would have invested in, but I'll go see it anyway.


I think F. Scott Fitzgerald may have been the first author to have a character who could live backwards in real time which offers some interesting possibilities. I think the idea could sustain a novel. It's possible that Fitzgerald might have written this, as he did with many other stories, as a way to pay the bills in 1922. The premise allows him to address aging and how it is viewed by society, but especially how it affects family, relationships and marriages.

A movie from a short story means that some things that are "suggested" in the story will be expanded on the screen. Probably, there will also be some things in the film that have no connection to the story. I'm okay with that. You don't have much of a choice as a filmmaker in that situation unless you're making a short film.

My own favorite Fitzgerald is still The Great Gatsby which I think is a "perfect" novel. In that classic, one of my my favorite lines is at the end:

"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."


The quote appears on Fitzgerald's grave and it inspired a song by Eric Carmen and it keeps coming back to me as I age in an un-Buttonish way into the future.




(Film Trailer)

Time Machines


When I was in second grade, I saw the film The Time Machine at a drive-in theater. It was directed by George Pal, starred Rod Taylor, and was released in 1960. It was scary. It was cool. It had "primitive" special effects by today's standards. But I loved it.

Eventually, it sent me to the library to get the novel by H.G. Wells. Twenty years later, I taught that book to a bunch of like-minded seventh graders that I had lured into reading its very 19th century pages with very 21st century imaginings about traveling through time.

Then, the summer after fourth grade, I tried to build a time machine in my own basement. I had a "lab" in a old coal bin that was full of chemistry sets, rockets, rocks, any tool I could find, model car kits and salvaged electronic components.

I had no idea where to start or what to do, but I just went at it. (Years later, I would jealously watch ET do the same kind of thing successfully.) I have never lost my fascination for time travel.

Last May, artist Paul St George exhibited an outdoor interactive video installation linking London and New York City in a faux "telectroscope."

Unfortunately, I only found out about it after it was over.

Of course, it wasn't any more real than the ones from earlier centuries - but it "worked."

It had a fictional "back story" that said that the device worked by using a transatlantic tunnel started by the artist's fictional great-grandfather, Alexander Stanhope St. George. People looking in one end in NYC could see and hear those at the other end in London.


telectroscope photo via my Flickr friend urbanshoregirl

I like the term "distant seeing" that was attached to the invention and has remained.

The installation art actually used a visual high speed broadband link between London and New York City that did allow people to see across the ocean.

You can't really call any of these "television systems" or "time machines." And the term telectroscope was replaced by the term "television." But, looking back at the original 1870s imaginings, it sounds like they were describing television or the Internet - or some merging of the two that is in progress right now.




Go Deeper