Services

Art by Georgia O'Keeffe


When most people think of Georgia O’Keeffe's art (if they know who she is), they probably picture bleached skulls in the desert, views of clouds, or voluptuous flowers with an erotic charge (that the artist may or may not have intended).

But there are also mixed in there Polaroid prints of her dog, watercolor sketches of ladies, or abstract cast iron pieces.

O'Keefe may be America’s most celebrated female artist. To get beyond her best-known pieces, you can now visit the 1100+ works in the Georgia O’Keeffe Museum’s online collection to get a more complete understanding of the life and work of the iconic artist, who died in 1986 at the age of 98.



Some places to begin:

the collection

bleached skulls in the desert

views of clouds

those erotic flowers 

watercolor sketches

massive cast iron abstractions

her evolution as an artist 

You can also view works by other artists in the collection, including two very significant men in her life, photographer Alfred Stieglitz and ceramicist Juan Hamilton.

And watch a documentary introduction to O’Keeffe, narrated by Gene Hackman, below:


Source: Art by Georgia O'Keeffe  | Open Culture

Hello and Goodbye Interstellar Traveler, 3I/ATLAS


Do you like a mystery? I know these cold case TV shows are very popular. Here's one that is a mystery and a cold case and is also real - but not solved. It's all about an interstellar traveler, designated 3I/ATLAS.

The case began on July 1, 2025, when the very official NASA-funded ATLAS (Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System) telescope in Chile first reported the observation of a faint, fast-moving speck. 

Initial calculations by the Minor Planet Center revealed a trajectory of impossible geometry: a hyperbolic orbit with an astounding eccentricity of approximately 6.137. That mysterious kinematic signature confirms that the object was unbound to the Sun's gravity. It originated from a different star system. It is an authentic interstellar interloper.

It is currently executing a close, swift pass through our star system. It's the third confirmed object of its kind. Its arrival is not merely an event; it is a profound scientific riddle wrapped in the volatile cloak of an alien comet.

As the comet rushed toward its perihelion (closest approach to the Sun), it began to reveal itself—and the mystery deepened. On July 2, observations solidified its cometary nature by detecting a faint coma and tail. This activity was unexpected, commencing at $6.4 \text{ AU}$ from the Sun (farther than Jupiter’s orbit), a distance typically too great for water ice sublimation. The activity, instead, was driven by highly volatile, deep-space ices.

Detailed spectral analysis conducted by space assets like the JWST confirmed an extraordinary chemical profile. These eccentric chemical "fingerprints" imply that 3I/ATLAS is either an exquisitely pristine ancient comet, untouched by radiation for eons, or something else entirely.

On October 28, 2025, the celestial visitor neared its peak velocity, and perihelion occurred on October 29. The comet is not an Earth threat, but it was a great scientific opportunity. 

The scientific community, utilizing every resource from the Hubble Space Telescope to the Mars Express orbiter, had mere weeks remaining before 3I/ATLAS executed its final, speedy escape.

Once again, it has taken its secrets back into the interstellar darkness.

Talking to Yourself: Making the Abstract Concrete


Talking to yourself may seem like something only eccentric people do, but in reality, it’s one of the most powerful tools your brain has for learning. 

Psychologists call it “self-talk” or “verbal thinking,” and it turns out to be a natural way for the mind to organize information, strengthen memory, and manage emotions. From early childhood onward, people often speak their thoughts out loud when trying to focus, solve problems, or make decisions. What appears to be idle chatter is actually an important part of how we think, learn, and remember.

When you talk to yourself, you are taking something abstract—your thoughts—and turning it into concrete language. This process externalizes your thinking, forcing you to arrange ideas in a logical order and to make sense of them as you speak. For example, saying to yourself, “First I need to understand this equation, then I can solve for x,” not only guides your actions but helps you organize the steps of reasoning in your mind. It is similar to what teachers do when they “think aloud” to demonstrate problem-solving to students. By hearing the reasoning out loud, students (and the speakers themselves) make sense of what would otherwise stay vague and internal.

Verbal thinking also stimulates several regions of the brain at once. When you speak out loud, you engage the areas responsible for producing and understanding language, but you also activate regions that handle movement, auditory processing, and memory. The combination of seeing, saying, and hearing information gives your brain multiple forms of input. This makes the learning experience richer and more durable. The more sensory systems involved in processing information, the more connections your brain can form to that information, making it easier to recall later.

Another important benefit of self-talk is its ability to focus attention. The human mind is easily distracted, and silent thinking often drifts from one idea to another. Speaking your thoughts out loud provides a kind of anchor. It keeps your attention fixed on what you’re doing and reminds you of your goal. When a student says, “Now I’m going to summarize this paragraph,” the spoken sentence reinforces their intention and helps them resist distractions. It’s an act of self-regulation, similar to how athletes talk themselves through complex routines or how drivers might mutter directions to stay alert. This form of spoken focus can be particularly useful during long study sessions or demanding projects when concentration begins to waver.

Talking to yourself also strengthens memory and retention. Researchers have identified something called the “production effect,” which refers to the improvement in recall that happens when people say information out loud instead of just reading it silently. The act of speaking forces the brain to encode the material more actively. By engaging the muscles of speech and the auditory system, the learner creates a stronger and more distinctive memory trace. It’s the difference between passively seeing a word on a page and hearing yourself pronounce it. Students who read definitions, formulas, or historical facts aloud are often surprised at how much more easily they can remember them later.

Self-talk doesn’t just help you remember—it helps you reason. When you talk through a problem, you make your thought process more deliberate. This slows down your reasoning just enough for you to examine each step carefully. It encourages what psychologists call metacognition, or “thinking about thinking.” Through metacognition, you can notice mistakes, test strategies, and decide whether your approach is working. For instance, a math student might talk through a geometry proof step by step, catching logical errors along the way. A writer might read a paragraph aloud and suddenly notice awkward phrasing or unclear ideas that seemed fine when silent. Verbal thinking allows you to monitor your own understanding in real time.

There is also a strong emotional component to self-talk. The way we speak to ourselves can influence our mood, motivation, and even stress levels. Encouraging phrases like “I can do this” or “Let’s stay calm and try again” may sound simple, but they trigger neural pathways related to self-regulation and resilience. Positive self-talk can reduce anxiety and help maintain focus, especially under pressure. On the other hand, harsh or negative self-talk can increase stress and make learning harder. The words we use toward ourselves matter because the brain responds to them much as it would to hearing them from another person. Students preparing for an exam, athletes training for competition, or performers rehearsing for a show often rely on self-talk to boost confidence and control nerves.

Another way talking to yourself aids learning is by revealing what you don’t yet understand. When you try to explain something aloud, even if no one else is listening, you quickly discover the gaps in your knowledge. You might realize you can repeat facts but can’t explain why they are true, or that you understand a process in general but not in detail. This experience of running into the limits of your understanding is valuable—it tells you exactly what to study next. The physicist Richard Feynman promoted this approach, now called the “Feynman Technique,” which involves explaining a concept as if you were teaching it to someone else. If you can’t explain it clearly, you don’t fully understand it. Talking to yourself works the same way.

Over time, verbal thinking can also improve communication and writing skills. Speaking forces you to choose words, build sentences, and express ideas coherently. The more you do it, the easier it becomes to translate thoughts into clear language. Students who practice summarizing readings or explaining theories out loud often find their essays and presentations become sharper and more confident. By strengthening the connection between thought and expression, self-talk develops both intellectual and linguistic ability.

Interestingly, children use self-talk quite naturally as they learn. Developmental psychologist Lev Vygotsky observed that young children often talk to themselves while playing or solving puzzles. This “private speech,” as he called it, helps them guide their own behavior and internalize complex tasks. As people grow older, they tend to silence that speech and replace it with inner thought, but the cognitive function remains the same. Adults who consciously reintroduce verbal thinking often rediscover how effective it can be for focusing attention and understanding difficult material.

In modern classrooms and study environments, students are sometimes encouraged to work quietly, but silence is not always the most productive condition for the brain. Whispering through an explanation, summarizing a passage aloud, or narrating steps in a science experiment can make learning more active and engaging. Some students even record themselves explaining topics and play them back to reinforce memory. The goal isn’t to fill the room with chatter, but to use speech strategically as a mental tool.

Talking to yourself, then, is far from a sign of oddness or distraction. It’s an advanced cognitive strategy that integrates language, thought, and emotion. It transforms learning from a passive act of receiving information into an active process of constructing meaning. When you speak your thoughts, you are essentially teaching yourself, reinforcing what you know, and identifying what you don’t. You involve multiple senses, strengthen neural connections, and give your ideas a clearer shape.

Whether you’re studying for an exam, learning a new skill, or simply trying to organize your day, giving voice to your thoughts can make a noticeable difference. It helps you focus, remember, reason, and stay motivated. The next time you catch yourself talking out loud while working through a problem, don’t be embarrassed. You’re not losing your mind—you’re using it in one of the most effective ways possible.

I told you so. You damned fools.

H. G. Wells was born Herbert George Wells in Bromley, England in 1866. He is known as one of the fathers of modern science fiction. He published classics such as The Time Machine, The Island of Doctor Moreau, and The War of the Worlds within the first few years of his writing career. I read all of those, first as a kid in comic book versions, and later as novels.

H.G Wells published dozens of novels, and also story collections and books of nonfiction that had little to do with sci-fi. He was educated in biology and maintained an interest in it through his writing. He was also a strong believer in socialism.

Science fiction writers often try to predict and sometimes hit the target accurately. When Wells wrote in the 1930s that one day there would be an encyclopedia that was constantly reviewed and updated and would be accessible to all people, I suppose he was asking for Wikipedia.

His bestselling two-volume work, The Outline of History (1920), popularised world history. Historians gave it mixed reviews, but it sold so well that it made him a rich man.

A letter he wrote to James Joyce in November 1928 has him being not very kind in his reading of Ulysses and early passages of Joyce’s Finnegans Wake that were in literary magazines at the time. Wells preferred a well-plotted story to a stream of consciousness novel.
Your last two works have been more amusing and exciting to write than they will ever be to read. Take me as a typical common reader. Do I get much pleasure from this work? No. Do I feel I am getting something new and illuminating as I do when I read Anrep’s dreadful translation of Pavlov’s badly written book on Conditioned Reflexes? No. So I ask: Who the hell is this Joyce who demands so many waking hours of the few thousand I have still to live for a proper appreciation of his quirks and fancies and flashes of rendering? 
I tried reading Joyce's book when I was in college when my brain was much more flexible to literature. I couldn't get through it. I read James Joyce and liked his earlier work (Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man), but the further out to sea he went, the more I was drowning in the words.

Here's a sample from the first chapter of Finnegans Wake (it's online)
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs. Sir Tristram, violer d'amores, fr'over the short sea, had passencore rearrived from North Armorica on this side the scraggy isthmus of Europe Minor to wielderfight his penisolate war: nor had topsawyer's rocks by the stream Oconee exaggerated themselse to Laurens County's gorgios while they went doublin their mumper all the time: nor avoice from afire bellowsed mishe mishe to tauftauf thuartpeatrick: not yet, though venissoon after, had a kidscad buttended a bland old isaac: not yet, though all's fair in vanessy, were sosie sesthers wroth with twone nathandjoe. Rot a peck of pa's malt had Jhem or Shen brewed by arclight and rory end to the regginbrow was to be seen ringsome on the aquaface.

Was Wells correct in his reading of Joyce?

One thing that Wells contributed to the science fiction genre was his "new system of ideas."  That approach was to try to make the story as credible as possible. He did that by emphasizing the science, even if the writer and reader know that some aspects are quite improbable if not impossible.

This "plausible impossible" about things like invisibility or time travel was new in speculative fiction.  Wells added a sense of realism to the concepts that the readers were not familiar with. In "Wells's Law", a science fiction story should contain only a single extraordinary assumption

A meeting of "Wells," as in H.G. Wells meets Orson Welles, was recorded in this brief radio broadcast that came after Orson had pulled off his radio play of Wells' War of the Worlds and shocked the U.S. radio audience and before he changed film history with Citizen Kane.


H.G. Wells also had strong opinions about politics, though he did not make much of an impact on British or world views.

Wells died just before his 80th birthday. He lived to see some of his fictional ideas come to pass in some form. His 1914 novel, The World Set Free, described bombs that would explode repeatedly, based on their radioactivity, which is much like a nuclear chain reaction.

In his 1908 book, The War in the Air, he predicted a kind of modern warfare with airplanes dominating. In the 1921 edition of the book, he sadly noted in the preface that he had been correct. Twenty years later, in the 1941 edition, he updated again, saying "Is there anything to add to that preface now? Nothing except my epitaph. That, when the time comes, will manifestly have to be: 'I told you so. You damned fools.'"